Guide

SSP climate scenarios explained: from SSP1-1.9 to SSP5-8.5

Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) scenarios describe possible futures for society and emissions, and they drive the CMIP6 climate projections behind the IPCC's Sixth Assessment Report. In a label such as SSP2-4.5, the first number is the storyline and the second the approximate radiative forcing reached in 2100, in W/m².

Last reviewed18 September 2026

Key takeaways

  • In SSPx-y, x is the socio-economic storyline, from SSP1 (sustainability) to SSP5 (rapid growth), and y the approximate radiative forcing in 2100 in W/m².
  • The IPCC's best estimates of warming in 2081–2100, relative to 1850–1900, range from 1.4 °C under SSP1-1.9 to 4.4 °C under SSP5-8.5.
  • Until about 2040 the scenarios barely differ (best estimates of 1.5–1.6 °C); the choice matters most for buildings that will stand well beyond mid-century.
  • The IPCC's Working Group III describes SSP5-8.5 as a high-end, high-risk scenario, not business as usual.
  • No likelihood is attached to any scenario, so test designs against more than one.

What are SSP scenarios?

SSPs are storylines of how the world could develop, each with different challenges for cutting emissions and for adapting to climate change. The IPCC summarizes them as SSP1 (sustainability), SSP2 (middle of the road), SSP3 (regional rivalry), SSP4 (inequality) and SSP5 (rapid growth). Each storyline was then turned into energy, land-use and emission pathways reaching different levels of radiative forcing by 2100.

The IPCC's Sixth Assessment Report uses five illustrative combinations, all starting in 2015: SSP1-1.9, SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5. The IPCC does not assess how likely each one is, and it notes that the SSPs do not cover every possible future.

What do the five main scenarios mean?

Other combinations exist, such as SSP4-3.4 and SSP4-6.0, and some data sets include them; the Köppen-Geiger maps by Beck et al. (2023), for example, cover seven scenarios.

  • SSP1-1.9, very low emissions: CO₂ emissions fall to net zero around 2050 and then below zero. It was added to explore limiting warming to about 1.5 °C.
  • SSP1-2.6, low emissions: CO₂ reaches net zero after 2050. It mirrors the earlier RCP2.6, and under it warming of 2 °C is unlikely to be exceeded this century.
  • SSP2-4.5, intermediate: CO₂ emissions stay around current levels until mid-century and then fall, without reaching net zero by 2100.
  • SSP3-7.0, high: a world of regional rivalry in which CO₂ emissions roughly double from current levels by 2100.
  • SSP5-8.5, very high: fossil-fuel-intensive growth, with CO₂ emissions roughly doubling from current levels by 2050.

How much warming does each scenario mean?

The IPCC's best estimates of global surface warming relative to 1850–1900, as 20-year averages for 2021–2040, 2041–2060 and 2081–2100:

  • SSP1-1.9: 1.5 °C, 1.6 °C and 1.4 °C.
  • SSP1-2.6: 1.5 °C, 1.7 °C and 1.8 °C.
  • SSP2-4.5: 1.5 °C, 2.0 °C and 2.7 °C.
  • SSP3-7.0: 1.5 °C, 2.1 °C and 3.6 °C.
  • SSP5-8.5: 1.6 °C, 2.4 °C and 4.4 °C.

How do SSPs relate to the older RCPs?

The Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) drove the CMIP5 projections of the IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report and older future weather files. The SSP-based scenarios cover the same forcing levels and add a new low one at 1.9 W/m², so SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 broadly follow RCP2.6, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5.

The results are not identical, because CMIP6 uses updated climate models and updated emission and land-use inputs. You will still meet RCPs in practice: CIBSE's 2025 UK weather data, for example, uses UKCP18 projections for RCP2.6, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5.

How to choose scenarios for building design

  • Start from the building's life. For a building completed around 2030, look at mid-century and at the end of its expected life; the scenarios differ little before about 2040 and a lot by 2081–2100.
  • Use more than one scenario. A practical pairing is an intermediate scenario (SSP2-4.5) as the central case and a high one (SSP3-7.0 or SSP5-8.5) as a stress test for overheating and cooling capacity.
  • Treat SSP5-8.5 as a high-end risk case. The IPCC's Working Group III notes that high-end scenarios have become considerably less likely since its Fifth Assessment Report but cannot be ruled out.
  • Remember that global averages hide local change. Between 2011 and 2020, land had warmed by 1.59 °C against 0.88 °C over the ocean, relative to 1850–1900, and a site's summers and winters can change differently from the global figure.
  • Record the scenario, period and data source in the design report, so the assumptions can be revisited when projections are updated.

SSP scenarios in C4B

C4B uses the five main scenarios, SSP1-1.9, SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5, in two places. The climate zone map has a year slider from 1901 to 2100, with a choice of the five scenarios for future years, based on Beck et al. (2023). In projects on paid plans, the future climate module morphs the site's weather file to any year from 2025 to 2100 under any of the five scenarios, using the World Bank Climate Change Knowledge Portal's CMIP6 multi-model median for temperature, humidity and solar radiation, and prepares four scenarios automatically for the building's default mid-life year, 27 years ahead.

Frequently asked questions

What does the 8.5 in SSP5-8.5 mean?

It is the approximate radiative forcing in 2100: a change of about 8.5 watts per square metre in the Earth's energy balance relative to pre-industrial conditions. The SSP5 part names the socio-economic storyline, a world of rapid, fossil-fuel-intensive growth.

Is SSP5-8.5 the business-as-usual scenario?

No. The IPCC's Working Group III states that RCP8.5 and SSP5-8.5 do not represent a typical business-as-usual projection and are only useful as high-end, high-risk scenarios. That makes SSP5-8.5 a stress test, not a central case.

Which SSP scenario should I use for a building project?

Use at least two. An intermediate scenario such as SSP2-4.5 gives a central case, and SSP3-7.0 or SSP5-8.5 tests resilience. Look at years that matter for the building, such as completion, mid-life and end of life.

What is the difference between SSP2-4.5 and RCP4.5?

Both reach about 4.5 W/m² of radiative forcing in 2100. RCP4.5 drove the older CMIP5 models, while SSP2-4.5 drives CMIP6 models with updated emission and land-use inputs and a socio-economic storyline, so their projections are similar but not identical.

Why do most tools show no SSP4 scenario?

The IPCC's Sixth Assessment Report focuses on five illustrative scenarios, none of which is from SSP4, and services such as the World Bank's Climate Change Knowledge Portal follow the same five. SSP4-3.4 and SSP4-6.0 exist and appear in some data sets.

See it for your site

See your site's climate before design begins

Pin any location and get climate, comfort and preliminary energy insight your whole team can read. Start with a 7-day free trial, or book a 30-minute demo.

References

Related guides